Please spare a thought for artificial intelligence (AI). It may not have feelings yet but, if it did, it would feel devastated by all the nasty things people are saying about it. All it's trying to do is take our jobs and potentially destroy the world and people can't stop being mean. Exhibit one: a recent controversy with the organisation that runs National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo), a yearly challenge to produce a manuscript in a month. In a recent statement, NaNoWriMo wrote that it doesn't explicitly support or condemn any approach to writing, "including the use of AI". Further: "The categorical condemnation of artificial intelligence has classist and ableist undertones … questions around the use of AI tie to questions around privilege."

National Novel Writing Month has long been known for its quirky, homegrown approach to creativity: Write a novel during the month of November! But last Friday, the 25-year-old nonprofit, known as NaNoWriMo for short, shocked many in the writing community when it published a controversial statement detailing its position on AI. In it, NaNoWriMo asserted that the "categorical condemnation" of artificial intelligence has "classist and ableist undertones." The statement went viral on social media over the weekend, drawing fire from longtime participants and well-known authors, some of whom credit the completion of their first novels to the organization. Four members of NaNoWriMo's writers board, including science fiction/fantasy writer Daniel José Older and fantasy writer Cass Morris, have now publicly stepped down from their roles in response.